I'm about to participate in my first critique session using the Liz Lerman method, and am most stumped by the 2nd step "artist as questioner". I wonder what I should question- the work, my reader's curiosities, my methodology? What am I, the artist, doing during this time?
thank you for your thoughts on neutral questions & mindful consent to opinions; it's important to remember the human beside the work
Thanks for the note. Your best source for detailed questions is the actual source: https://lizlerman.com/critical-response-process/ - But my understanding of the "artist as questioner" is that the presenting artist directs the conversation with the participants. These can be any questions the artist wants answers to that would help their process – about the work itself, the experience of the work, sequencing, language, and the like.
I'm about to participate in my first critique session using the Liz Lerman method, and am most stumped by the 2nd step "artist as questioner". I wonder what I should question- the work, my reader's curiosities, my methodology? What am I, the artist, doing during this time?
thank you for your thoughts on neutral questions & mindful consent to opinions; it's important to remember the human beside the work
Thanks for the note. Your best source for detailed questions is the actual source: https://lizlerman.com/critical-response-process/ - But my understanding of the "artist as questioner" is that the presenting artist directs the conversation with the participants. These can be any questions the artist wants answers to that would help their process – about the work itself, the experience of the work, sequencing, language, and the like.